aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/routers
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorZettat1232023-02-20 19:30:41 +0800
committerGitHub2023-02-20 19:30:41 +0800
commit9a83aa28a351c9af1731a94ce0e1b5d3842db4e8 (patch)
tree009e05aba7fb05586abf1ce4283373e3965807f6 /routers
parent3596df52c09831f7f39f8416264ff267954f35a0 (diff)
Get rules by id when editing branch protection rule (#22932)
When users rename an existing branch protection rule, a new rule with the new name will be created and the old rule will still exist. ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276442-d3c001ad-e693-44ec-9ad2-b33f2666b49b.png) --- ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276478-547c3b93-b3f1-4292-a1ef-c1b7747fe1bb.png) The reason is that the `SettingsProtectedBranchPost` function only get branch protection rule by name before updating or creating a rule. When the rule name changes, the function cannot find the existing rule so it will create a new rule rather than update the existing rule. To fix the bug, the function should get rule by id first. --------- Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'routers')
-rw-r--r--routers/web/repo/setting_protected_branch.go34
1 files changed, 30 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/routers/web/repo/setting_protected_branch.go b/routers/web/repo/setting_protected_branch.go
index a54565c1f..0a8c39fef 100644
--- a/routers/web/repo/setting_protected_branch.go
+++ b/routers/web/repo/setting_protected_branch.go
@@ -166,10 +166,36 @@ func SettingsProtectedBranchPost(ctx *context.Context) {
}
var err error
- protectBranch, err = git_model.GetProtectedBranchRuleByName(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, f.RuleName)
- if err != nil {
- ctx.ServerError("GetProtectBranchOfRepoByName", err)
- return
+ if f.RuleID > 0 {
+ // If the RuleID isn't 0, it must be an edit operation. So we get rule by id.
+ protectBranch, err = git_model.GetProtectedBranchRuleByID(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, f.RuleID)
+ if err != nil {
+ ctx.ServerError("GetProtectBranchOfRepoByID", err)
+ return
+ }
+ if protectBranch != nil && protectBranch.RuleName != f.RuleName {
+ // RuleName changed. We need to check if there is a rule with the same name.
+ // If a rule with the same name exists, an error should be returned.
+ sameNameProtectBranch, err := git_model.GetProtectedBranchRuleByName(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, f.RuleName)
+ if err != nil {
+ ctx.ServerError("GetProtectBranchOfRepoByName", err)
+ return
+ }
+ if sameNameProtectBranch != nil {
+ ctx.Flash.Error(ctx.Tr("repo.settings.protected_branch_duplicate_rule_name"))
+ ctx.Redirect(fmt.Sprintf("%s/settings/branches/edit?rule_name=%s", ctx.Repo.RepoLink, protectBranch.RuleName))
+ return
+ }
+ }
+ } else {
+ // FIXME: If a new ProtectBranch has a duplicate RuleName, an error should be returned.
+ // Currently, if a new ProtectBranch with a duplicate RuleName is created, the existing ProtectBranch will be updated.
+ // But we cannot modify this logic now because many unit tests rely on it.
+ protectBranch, err = git_model.GetProtectedBranchRuleByName(ctx, ctx.Repo.Repository.ID, f.RuleName)
+ if err != nil {
+ ctx.ServerError("GetProtectBranchOfRepoByName", err)
+ return
+ }
}
if protectBranch == nil {
// No options found, create defaults.