Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
|
|
When creating attachments (issue, release, repo) the file size (being
part of the multipart file header) is passed through the chain of
creating an attachment to ensure the MinIO client can stream the file
directly instead of having to read it to memory completely at first.
Fixes #23393
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
|
|
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22676
Context Data `IsOrganizationMember` and `IsOrganizationOwner` is used to
control the visibility of `people` and `team` tab.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/2871ea08096cba15546f357d0ec473734ee9d8be/templates/org/menu.tmpl#L19-L40
And because of the reuse of user projects page, User Context is changed
to Organization Context. But the value of `IsOrganizationMember` and
`IsOrganizationOwner` are not being given.
I reused func `HandleOrgAssignment` to add them to the ctx, but may have
some unnecessary variables, idk whether it is ok.
I found there is a missing `PageIsViewProjects` at create project page.
|
|
Currently we can add webhooks for organizations but not for users. This
PR adds the latter. You can access it from the current users settings.
![grafik](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1666336/197391408-15dfdc23-b476-4d0c-82f7-9bc9b065988f.png)
|
|
sources (#23397)
When there is an error creating a new openIDConnect authentication
source try to handle the error a little better.
Close #23283
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
|
|
A part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22865
|
|
A part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22865
user/org project's `RepoID` is always 0, we need to check `OwnerID`
|
|
A part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22865
We have edit buttons in projects list page and project view page.
But after user edit a project, it will always redirect to the projects
list page.
|
|
Instead of adding it
# Before
On the raw commit page:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20454870/223470744-cdf11898-e023-4198-8c8b-c294e5d78b73.png)
# After
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20454870/223470596-af898d66-bd5b-4ddb-b220-ceb1f149bfec.png)
Fixes #23308
---------
Signed-off-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
|
|
Fix #23357 .
Now the `/repos/{owner}/{repo}/git/notes/{sha}` API supports getting
notes by a ref or sha
(https://try.gitea.io/api/swagger#/repository/repoGetNote). But the
`GetNote` func can only accept commit ID.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/a12f5757372f751d25f9e5ca1f168f6920ded894/modules/git/notes_nogogit.go#L18
So we need to convert the query parameter to commit ID before calling
`GetNote`.
|
|
As title.
|
|
Replace #23350.
Refactor `setting.Database.UseMySQL` to
`setting.Database.Type.IsMySQL()`.
To avoid mismatching between `Type` and `UseXXX`.
This refactor can fix the bug mentioned in #23350, so it should be
backported.
|
|
A part of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22865/commits
The old code will cause 500 error.
|
|
Changes in this PR :
Strips incoming request URL of additional slashes (/). For example an
input like
`https://git.data.coop//halfd/new-website.git` is translated to
`https://git.data.coop/halfd/new-website.git`
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/20462
Fix #23242
---------
Co-authored-by: zeripath <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
submitting a single comment (#23245)
Close #23241
Before: press Ctrl+Enter in the Code Review Form, a single comment will
be added.
After: press Ctrl+Enter in the Code Review Form, start the review with
pending comments.
The old name `is_review` is not clear, so the new code use
`pending_review` as the new name.
Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
|
|
When creating commit status for Actons jobs, a payload with nil
`HeadCommit` will cause panic.
Reported at:
https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/28#issuecomment-732166
Although the `HeadCommit` probably can not be nil after #23215,
`CreateCommitStatus` should protect itself, to avoid being broken in the
future.
In addition, it's enough to print error log instead of returning err
when `CreateCommitStatus` failed.
---------
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
Before:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/222084932-a7643fbe-2d9f-48db-b25d-74ace49e03f4.png)
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/222084887-fde3500d-dad3-4902-9c82-c4f71f23f83b.png)
After:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/222084565-eeef1110-9d9d-40b4-a26b-fbd5a307f14e.png)
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/222084728-6c96d7c1-a399-43d5-8369-392ad5017b7f.png)
---------
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
|
|
## TLDR
* Fix the broken page / broken image problem when click "Install"
* Close #20089
* Fix the Password Hash Algorithm display problem for #22942
* Close #23183
* Close #23184
## Details
### The broken page / broken image problem when click "Install"
(Redirect failed after install gitea #23184)
Before: when click "install", all new requests will fail, because the
server has been restarted. Users just see a broken page with broken
images, sometimes the server is not ready but the user would have been
redirect to "/user/login" page, then the users see a new broken page
(connection refused or something wrong ...)
After: only check InstallLock=true for necessary handlers, and sleep for
a while before restarting the server, then the browser has enough time
to load the "post-install" page. And there is a script to check whether
"/user/login" is ready, the user will only be redirected to the login
page when the server is ready.
### During new instance setup make 'Gitea Base URL' filled from
window.location.origin #20089
If the "app_url" input contains `localhost` (the default value from
config), use current window's location href as the `app_url` (aka
ROOT_URL)
### Fix the Password Hash Algorithm display problem for "Provide the
ability to set password hash algorithm parameters #22942"
Before: the UI shows `pbkdf2$50000$50`
<details>
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/221917143-e1e54798-1698-4fee-a18d-00c48081fc39.png)
</details>
After: the UI shows `pbkdf2`
<details>
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2114189/221916999-97a15be8-2ebb-4a01-bf93-dac18e354fcc.png)
</details>
### GET data: net::ERR_INVALID_URL #23183
Cause by empty `data:` in `<link rel="manifest"
href="data:{{.ManifestData}}">`
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
|
|
|
|
Fixes the grammar in the error message in case a runner token has
already been activated
|
|
Close: #22784
1. On GH, we can reopen a PR which was closed before after pushing
commits. After reopening PR, we can see the commits that were pushed
after closing PR in the time line. So the case of
[issue](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22784) is a bug which
needs to be fixed.
2. After closing a PR and pushing commits, `headBranchSha` is not equal
to `sha`(which is the last commit ID string of reference). If the
judgement exists, the button of reopen will not display. So, skip the
judgement if the status of PR is closed.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222037529-651fccf9-0bba-433e-b2f0-79c17e0cc812.png)
3. Even if PR is already close, we should still insert comment record
into DB when we push commits.
So we should still call function `CreatePushPullComment()`.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/067b0c2664d127c552ccdfd264257caca4907a77/services/pull/pull.go#L260-L282
So, I add a switch(`includeClosed`) to the
`GetUnmergedPullRequestsByHeadInfo` func to control whether the status
of PR must be open. In this case, by setting `includeClosed` to `true`,
we can query the closed PR.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222621045-bb80987c-10c5-4eac-aa0c-1fb9c6aefb51.png)
4. In the loop of comments, I use the`latestCloseCommentID` variable to
record the last occurrence of the close comment.
In the go template, if the status of PR is closed, the comments whose
type is `CommentTypePullRequestPush(29)` after `latestCloseCommentID`
won't be rendered.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222058913-c91cf3e3-819b-40c5-8015-654b31eeccff.png)
e.g.
1). The initial status of the PR is opened.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453617-33c5093e-f712-4cd6-8489-9f87e2075869.png)
2). Then I click the button of `Close`. PR is closed now.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453694-25c588a9-c121-4897-9ae5-0b13cf33d20b.png)
3). I try to push a commit to this PR, even though its current status is
closed.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222453916-361678fb-7321-410d-9e37-5a26e8095638.png)
But in comments list, this commit do not display.This is as expected :)
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454169-7617a791-78d2-404e-be5e-77d555f93313.png)
4). Click the `Reopen` button, the commit which is pushed after closing
PR display now.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/33891828/222454533-897893b6-b96e-4701-b5cb-b1800f382b8f.png)
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
`renderReadmeFile` needs `readmeTreelink` as parameter but gets
`treeLink`.
The values of them look like as following:
`treeLink`: `/{OwnerName}/{RepoName}/src/branch/{BranchName}`
`readmeTreelink`:
`/{OwnerName}/{RepoName}/src/branch/{BranchName}/{ReadmeFileName}`
`path.Dir` in
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/8540fc45b11eff9a73753ca139f8ea5c38509bf5/routers/web/repo/view.go#L316
should convert `readmeTreelink` into
`/{OwnerName}/{RepoName}/src/branch/{BranchName}` instead of the current
`/{OwnerName}/{RepoName}/src/branch`.
Fixes #23151
---------
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
|
|
Before, the `dict "ctx" ...` map is used to pass data between templates.
Now, more and more templates need to use real Go context:
* #22962
* #23092
`ctx` is a Go concept for `Context`, misusing it may cause problems, and
it makes it difficult to review or refactor.
This PR contains 2 major changes:
* In the top scope of a template, the `$` is the same as the `.`, so the
old labels_sidebar's `root` is the `ctx`. So this `ctx` could just be
removed.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/commit/bd7f218dce01e0fb661b23b55995f5d51b4530e8
* Rename all other `ctx` to `ctxData`, and it perfectly matches how it
comes from backend: `"ctxData": ctx.Data`.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/23105/commits/7c01260e1df1dcb052e1cf86ebe982bf77c4407f
From now on, there is no `ctx` in templates. There are only:
* `ctxData` for passing data
* `Context` for Go context
|
|
Extract from #11669 and enhancement to #22585 to support exclusive
scoped labels in label templates
* Move label template functionality to label module
* Fix handling of color codes
* Add Advanced label template
|
|
Use context parameter in `services/repository`.
And use `cache.WithCacheContext(ctx)` to generate push action history
feeds.
Fix #23160
|
|
The name of the job or step comes from the workflow file, while the name
of the runner comes from its registration. If the strings used for these
names are too long, they could cause db issues.
|
|
GetActiveStopwatch & HasUserStopwatch is a hot piece of code that is
repeatedly called and on examination of the cpu profile for TestGit it
represents 0.44 seconds of CPU time. This PR reduces this time to 80ms.
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <leon@kske.dev>
|
|
The `isAdmin` param is no longer used so the comment should be removed.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/d27d36f2f4dd389050e613967ad2a5d02d250acc/routers/web/explore/repo.go#L36-L37
|
|
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/23150
Before:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/221390802-2317c6bc-d163-4def-b68b-6bb297143fe2.png)
After:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/221390823-87490351-39c3-4a40-b1d2-11fc5b85fa24.png)
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
This includes pull requests that you approved, requested changes or
commented on. Currently such pull requests are not visible in any of the
filters on /pulls, while they may need further action like merging, or
prodding the author or reviewers.
Especially when working with a large team on a repository it's helpful
to get a full overview of pull requests that may need your attention,
without having to sift through the complete list.
|
|
Previously only the last few activities where available. This works for
all activity and for activity on a date chosen on the heatmap.
|
|
The **Admin Repository Management** page and the **Explore Repository**
page both use the `RenderRepoSearch` function. In this function, the
`OnlyShowRelevant` search option is `true` when querying repositories
for admin page.
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/edf98a2dc30956c8e04b778bb7f1ce55c14ba963/routers/web/explore/repo.go#L99-L115
Refer to
[#19361](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/19361/files#diff-8058dfb85557010e0592d586675ec62ce406af7068e6311f39c160deac37f149R497),
the repositories with `is_empty=true` will be hidden if
`OnlyShowRelevant` is `true`.
Administrators should be able to see all repositories. So
`OnlyShowRelevant` shouldn't be set to `true` .
---------
Co-authored-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
|
|
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22621
|
|
Partially fix #23050
After #22294 merged, it always has a warning log like `cannot get
context cache` when starting up. This should not affect any real life
but it's annoying. This PR will fix the problem. That means when
starting up, getting the system settings will not try from the cache but
will read from the database directly.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
|
|
Currently, Gitea will run actions automatically which are triggered by
fork pull request. It's a security risk, people can create a PR and
modify the workflow yamls to execute a malicious script.
So we should require approval for first-time contributors, which is the
default strategy of a public repo on GitHub, see [Approving workflow
runs from public
forks](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs/approving-workflow-runs-from-public-forks).
Current strategy:
- don't need approval if it's not a fork PR;
- always need approval if the user is restricted;
- don't need approval if the user can write;
- don't need approval if the user has been approved before;
- otherwise, need approval.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217207121-badf50a8-826c-4425-bef1-d82d1979bc81.mov
GitHub has an option for that, you can see that at
`/<owner>/<repo>/settings/actions`, and we can support that later.
<img width="835" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217199990-2967e68b-e693-4e59-8186-ab33a1314a16.png">
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
Fixes
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22621#issuecomment-1439309200
|
|
minio/sha256-simd provides additional acceleration for SHA256 using
AVX512, SHA Extensions for x86 and ARM64 for ARM.
It provides a drop-in replacement for crypto/sha256 and if the
extensions are not available it falls back to standard crypto/sha256.
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
|
|
Fix #23000.
|
|
|
|
The API to create tokens is missing the ability to set the required
scopes for tokens, and to show them on the API and on the UI.
This PR adds this functionality.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
|
|
Close: #22910
---
I'm confused about that why does the api (`GET
/repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/files`) require caller to pass the
parameters `limit` and `page`.
In my case, the caller only needs to pass a `skip-to` to paging. This is
consistent with the api `GET /{owner}/{repo}/pulls/{index}/files`
So, I deleted the code related to `listOptions`
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
When users rename an existing branch protection rule, a new rule with
the new name will be created and the old rule will still exist.
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276442-d3c001ad-e693-44ec-9ad2-b33f2666b49b.png)
---
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/15528715/219276478-547c3b93-b3f1-4292-a1ef-c1b7747fe1bb.png)
The reason is that the `SettingsProtectedBranchPost` function only get
branch protection rule by name before updating or creating a rule. When
the rule name changes, the function cannot find the existing rule so it
will create a new rule rather than update the existing rule. To fix the
bug, the function should get rule by id first.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
Replaces: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22947
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22946
Probably related to https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/19530
Basically, many of the diffs were broken because they were comparing to
the base commit, where a 3-dot diff should be comparing to the [last
common
ancestor](https://matthew-brett.github.io/pydagogue/git_diff_dots.html).
This should have an integration test so that we don’t run into this
issue again.
---------
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Tran <jonnytran@gmail.com>
|
|
Some bugs caused by less unit tests in fundamental packages. This PR
refactor `setting` package so that create a unit test will be easier
than before.
- All `LoadFromXXX` files has been splited as two functions, one is
`InitProviderFromXXX` and `LoadCommonSettings`. The first functions will
only include the code to create or new a ini file. The second function
will load common settings.
- It also renames all functions in setting from `newXXXService` to
`loadXXXSetting` or `loadXXXFrom` to make the function name less
confusing.
- Move `XORMLog` to `SQLLog` because it's a better name for that.
Maybe we should finally move these `loadXXXSetting` into the `XXXInit`
function? Any idea?
---------
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
|
|
Same as https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22967
---------
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
This PR refactors and improves the password hashing code within gitea
and makes it possible for server administrators to set the password
hashing parameters
In addition it takes the opportunity to adjust the settings for `pbkdf2`
in order to make the hashing a little stronger.
The majority of this work was inspired by PR #14751 and I would like to
thank @boppy for their work on this.
Thanks to @gusted for the suggestion to adjust the `pbkdf2` hashing
parameters.
Close #14751
---------
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
|
|
Add a new "exclusive" option per label. This makes it so that when the
label is named `scope/name`, no other label with the same `scope/`
prefix can be set on an issue.
The scope is determined by the last occurence of `/`, so for example
`scope/alpha/name` and `scope/beta/name` are considered to be in
different scopes and can coexist.
Exclusive scopes are not enforced by any database rules, however they
are enforced when editing labels at the models level, automatically
removing any existing labels in the same scope when either attaching a
new label or replacing all labels.
In menus use a circle instead of checkbox to indicate they function as
radio buttons per scope. Issue filtering by label ensures that only a
single scoped label is selected at a time. Clicking with alt key can be
used to remove a scoped label, both when editing individual issues and
batch editing.
Label rendering refactor for consistency and code simplification:
* Labels now consistently have the same shape, emojis and tooltips
everywhere. This includes the label list and label assignment menus.
* In label list, show description below label same as label menus.
* Don't use exactly black/white text colors to look a bit nicer.
* Simplify text color computation. There is no point computing luminance
in linear color space, as this is a perceptual problem and sRGB is
closer to perceptually linear.
* Increase height of label assignment menus to show more labels. Showing
only 3-4 labels at a time leads to a lot of scrolling.
* Render all labels with a new RenderLabel template helper function.
Label creation and editing in multiline modal menu:
* Change label creation to open a modal menu like label editing.
* Change menu layout to place name, description and colors on separate
lines.
* Don't color cancel button red in label editing modal menu.
* Align text to the left in model menu for better readability and
consistent with settings layout elsewhere.
Custom exclusive scoped label rendering:
* Display scoped label prefix and suffix with slightly darker and
lighter background color respectively, and a slanted edge between them
similar to the `/` symbol.
* In menus exclusive labels are grouped with a divider line.
---------
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lauris BH <lauris@nix.lv>
|
|
Marius merged my last go-ap patch (https://lists.sr.ht/~mariusor/activitypub-go/%3Cf23190d1-1376-6ad1-63ee-9c0d291d1eb5%40exozy.me%3E#%3C20230218114214.b5hecpabruk66g7r@slate%3E) so we no longer have to use my custom fork
|
|
Fixes https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/22963
---------
Co-authored-by: Yarden Shoham <hrsi88@gmail.com>
|